Quick Links
Christopher Nolanhas slowly become mainstream Hollywood’s main director, trusted with massive budgets and wholly original concepts. It might be hard to recall some of his earliest work, likeInsomniawith Al Pacino and Robin Williams, but the middle of his filmography is where he began to take on the style and scale we associate with him today.InceptionandInterstellarrepresent a turning point in Nolan’s career,where his grandiosity or concept officially outweighed his penchant for smaller stories likeMementoorThe Prestige. They also represent Nolan’s directing abilities and what can happen when he exceeds them.
Inceptionis arguably the high point of Nolan’s concept movies. It balances high-thinking sci-fi with relatable character motivations and a sense of intrigue.Interstellar, however, is the first time Nolan took one step too far.Interstellarloses graspof its galaxy-stretching themes of love and family, wrapped up in layers of retention Nolan hadn’t stretched to before. Christopher Nolan has never been a character-led director, butboth films show a distinct course correction that has stayed with him forTenetand his most recentOppenheimer.
InceptionandInterstellarsit on either side on a precarious pendulum, so finely balanced that one small step for man is all it takes to throw it off irrevocably. Nolan must be applauded for working comfortably in a space nobody else is today, but he isn’t untouchable. Then again,bothInceptionandInterstellaroffer Nolan’s most intriguing puzzles, which ultimately work for different reasons.
‘Inception’ and ‘Interstellar’ are Both ‘Humanist’ Sci-Fi
The difference betweenInceptionandInterstellaris how they balance emotion and sci-fi concepts, with the former taking a more delicate approach.Inception’sfamily stakes are nothing revolutionary but allow the concept of dream heists to take on a human angle, asInterstellarspreads it out across space in a story spanning decades.
Nolan’s earlier movies may work better than his later ones because his concepts can be seen as an external metaphor for what the character is going through. The concept is intrinsic to the motivation, whereasInterstellar’splot quickly loses itselfin broad strokes compared toInception’ssofter sways.
There is an emotional core toInterstellar, butNolan fails to wrap his massive canvasaround the even larger themes he is grappling with. For all of its beauty,Interstellarfeels strangely masochistic in its view that we should abandon Earth, preaching about an unending love built in that context.Interstellaris a more ambitious project but does not establish its sci-fi context further than the Michael Caine poetry narration.Inceptionis similarly expansive but only explores its topic so much, which aligns with how deeply the characters explore their shortcomings. The balance is respected, but inInterstellar, Nolan goes for awe instead of tangible feelings.
‘Inception’ and ‘Interstellar’ Bleed into ‘Tenet’ and ‘Oppenheimer’
The shift between these two films has rippled into hissubsequent Nolan projects,TenetandOppenheimer.Interstellar’slarger stakes are what damagedTenet’sambition. There’s a certain joy in the ambiguity, but when dealing with ideas not so far removed from pre-existing sci-fi, there needs to be a stronger logic.
Tenetis largely a mess if you think about it for longer than a few moments, andInterstellaris the movie that took Nolan from human motivation to world motivation. Even when he’s gone larger, like inThe Dark Knight Rises, there’s often been that central humanizing pull, but neitherInterstellarnorTenethave that. Sci-fi can be barren and unfamiliar, but Nolan doesn’t have the nuance to pull this off.
This Is Why Christopher Nolan Refuses to Speculate on a Certain Fan Theory
Christopher Nolan has heard your fan theories about Neil/Max, and he has some thoughts.
InOppenheimer, Nolan somewhat falls into the trapof over-complicating things, this time with his editing technique.Inceptionworked so well because it infused genres like adventure into the predominant sci-fi subtext but didn’t have to over-compensate. As Nolan’s scales have increased, so has his seeming desire to make everything ‘epic’ when he doesn’t have to.
Christopher Nolan Is a Unique Director
Nolan is a special filmmaker who truly offers blockbuster cinema.InceptionandInterstellarare arguably the two most interesting films in his library and ultimately achieve different things.Inceptionis less worried about the concept than it is with how emotion complicates it.Interstellaris less personal, and with this, it is more epic. Just because Nolan is the only one trusted to do these big movies doesn’t mean he’s a master at doing them. Where his strengths lie is misdirection, both emotional and conceptual.
Before Christopher Nolan, the Coen Brothers Made a Fantastic Adaptation of ‘The Odyssey’
Christopher Nolan’s new film has been revealed, but another famous directing duo beat him to the punch in reimagining ‘The Odyssey’.
InceptionandInterstellarare crucial to understanding modern blockbuster filmmaking. They offer massive ideas encased in differing levels of emotional consequence and can be used as a benchmark for the closest we have come since Kubrick showed us how to achieve and, in some instances, intentionally avoid emotion in concept movies.InceptionandInterstellarare the two projects that sent Nolan into the atmosphere, but his ascent hasn’t been without its faults.
Few directors can reach the modern benchmark Nolan has set. AsInceptionandInterstellarsuggest, emotion is a fine tightrope between sincerity and spectacle, and maybe thrills need to be the only thing getting your attention.InceptionandInterstellarare both streaming on Netflix.
